Investigations of a Dog

As part of the research for my book (saying that still feels a bit weird, but I’m sure I’ll get used to it) I’m going through indemnity cases in class SP 24 in the UK National Archives (aka the PRO). The Indemnity Committee was set up by parliament in 1647 to protect soldiers and officials from prosecution for actions that they had carried out under the authority of parliament, such as requisitioning things for the army or arresting royalists. It also dealt with disputes over sequestered rents and debts, and helped to enforce parliament’s order that apprentices who joined the army should be allowed to count military service towards their term of apprenticeship. If someone was prosecuted in court for acts which were covered by the Indemnity Ordinance (and many were despite the Ordinance banning people from bringing cases of this kind) the defendant could send a petition to the Indemnity Committee asking for protection. In SP 24 there are 58 boxes of petitions and other papers relating to cases, such as depositions and lists of expenses. Unlike some classes these are quite well sorted: papers relating to each case are grouped together and sorted in roughly alphabetical order of the plaintiff’s name (although confusingly the plaintiff in an indemnity case is the defendant in the corresponding criminal prosecution). I’m particularly interested in cases relating to horse requisitioning. According to Ian Gentles, about 30% of the military cases involve horses, although from what I’ve seen so far military cases seem to be a minority as many cases are disputes between civilians over payment of rents and debts due to sequestered estates. It usually takes me less than an hour to skim through a box, look at the first petition in each case to see if it’s about horses, and photograph the relevant cases. Sometimes I get cases that look interesting for other reasons, but I try not to wander too far off topic too often. Since I’m photographing these papers for my research, and since the National Archives allow document images to be uploaded to Flickr, that’s just what I’m doing. I’m also putting transcripts or summaries of the documents, along with links to the images, on the Your Archives wiki. You can see what I’ve done so far, and follow my progress in future, via a Flickr collection and Your Archives category.

So far I’ve uploaded cases from the first 2 boxes. I have another 16 boxes ready to be uploaded, but I’m working on some Python scripts to automate the process. The trial run on the first two boxes proved that doing it all manually is quite labour intensive. First I copied the image files from my camera and sorted them into directories for each box. The directory structure is based on the archival reference, so there’s a directory called “SP 24” with sub-directories called “30”, “31” etc. Then I went into each of these directories and made sub-directories for each case, so it looks like this:

• SP 24
  • 30
    • 1 Abeary vs Windebanke
    • 1 Adams vs Haughton
    • 2 Alford vs King
    • etc
  • 31

And the path to a particular case would be:

SP 24/30/2 Alford vs King

Which looks quite similar to the archival reference.

The numbers at the start of the case name are the part number (each box usually contains three folders called part 1, part 2 and part 3 but I decided not to make directories for these). Up to here it has to be done manually as arranging cases into directories involves looking at the documents to see where a new case begins and to check the names. But from here a lot of it can be automated.

Each directory containing one case needs to have its own photoset on Flickr. I used Postr to upload one case at a time and then used Desktop Flickr Organizer to create a set and add photos to it (I got both of these applications from the Ubuntu repository – if you’re on Windows then… stop using Windows!). Then I used the Organizr on the Flickr website to drag each set into the “SP 24 Indemnity Cases” collection. Once the Flickr photos and sets were in place I went to the web page for each set, manually created a Zotero item for the case, and attached a link to the page. Finally I created a Your Archives page for each case and attached a link to it in Zotero. This includes a template that I made for indemnity cases which gives some basic information in a standardized form and includes a link to the relevant Flickr set. Doing all this manually for each case is quite tedious and takes a long time, so I’m working on some Python scripts to automate the process. What I want the scripts to do is:

1. Upload photos from multiple directories
2. Create a separate photoset for each directory, with a name based on the directory name and path
3. Get the ID of each set and write the IDs and names to a CSV file
4. (At this point I’ll manually edit the CSV file to add data that will be needed for Your Archives and Zotero and which can only be got by looking at the document images, eg full names of plaintiffs and defendants, date of the petition, summary of the case, categories/tags)
5. Use the data from the CSV file to construct a wiki page with the correct template and upload to Your Archives through the MediaWiki API
6. Export an XML file which can be imported into Zotero

So far I’ve written a Flickr upload script which does the first three steps and more or less works. Rather than working directly with the Flickr API I’m using the Python Flickr API library, which makes things very easy. It provides a flickr class with methods to handle API calls and authentication. Before using it you have to go to the App Garden and request an API key, but that doesn’t take long to do. App pages can be kept private, which is what I’m doing in this case as I don’t really have the time or skills to make my scripts fit for public consumption. The next step is to add error handling as the script only works as long as nothing goes wrong. In the real world, there are lots of things that could go wrong. The library throws an exception if it gets an error response from the API. Until I add some exception handling this means that the script just stops on an error. The script will need to keep track of what has and hasn’t been done (photos uploaded, sets created, photos added to sets) so that I can run it again if anything was left undone, and so that it doesn’t try to do the same thing again if it’s already been done. One annoying thing about Flickr’s public API is that it provides no way to create a collection or add sets to a collection. I assumed I’d be able to automate that part of the process but it looks like I’ll still have to do it manually.

For step 5 I’ll be using the Pywikipediabot library. I’ve already done some simple tests on a local MediaWiki installation and it seems quite easy to create a page. Once I’ve finished the script and thoroughly tested it I can ask for a bot account on Your Archives. Step 6 will involve learning a bit more about Zotero RDF. The easiest way to find out how to generate the right code is to export some similar existing items and look at the results.

So just because I’m writing a monograph it doesn’t mean I’ve abandoned digital history. I’ll still be using lots of digital tricks in the background, but they won’t necessarily be obvious in the text of the book. New technology is certainly making my research quicker and cheaper than it used to be. The stuff that I’ve written about above isn’t exactly revolutionary: it saves labour but it doesn’t offer new insights that couldn’t have been found before. But later in the project I’m planning to do some text mining which I hope will show me things that I couldn’t otherwise have found. I’ll also be revisiting phonetic algorithms for place name identification. And if I can’t think of anything else to blog about, there are likely to be some interesting stories in the indemnity cases.

Yesterday Bill Turkel announced that The Programming Historian is now available. This is a book, but not as we know it. It’s published in the form of a website and is completely free to access. As the name suggests, it’s an introduction to computer programming aimed specifically at historians. The tutorials will get you doing useful things as soon as possible, even if you have no previous experience of programming. If you do know programming it’s also worth a look. I found lots of useful tips in it.

By enabling more historians to make better use of digital technology the book is helping to change the way that we do history. And it’s also helping to change the way that we present our research, because it’s a concrete example of the advantages of open access publishing on the web. This means a whole lot more than not having to pay to read it. Although the book has been published, it’s still a work in progress. New chapters will be added in future, and existing ones can be improved in response to feedback from readers. Any typos, factual errors or unclear sentences can all be corrected very easily. Comments from reviewers are displayed on accompanying discussion pages so you can see how the text developed and what people thought of it. The book can keep growing to meet the needs of digital historians: there doesn’t ever have to be a point when it’s finally finished like there is with a printed book.

Go and read it. Now.

Last week I posted about experiments with Python to automatically identify places mentioned in lists of horses donated to parliament’s armies in the English Civil War. The initial results were very encouraging. Using the difflib algorithm to compare a selection of places with a list of Buckinghamshire parishes gave very encouraging results. Since then I’ve scaled it up and also tried some different approaches. The results are less clear cut when comparing bigger lists, but I’ve been able to write a program which should save me a lot of time compared to the manual methods that I used during my PhD.

(more…)

Never mind the scary theory, here’s some empiricism. And computer programming. The piece I’m working on is an analysis of lists of horses donated to the parliamentarian army in the First Civil War. There are some figures derived from these lists in my forthcoming article in War In History and in the seminar paper that I posted in November, but I’m trying to write an article which examines them in much more detail. This article will be related to debates over allegiance and the causes of the war, which is why I’ve been trying to explore the historiography and think about theoretical issues, but the substance of it will be fairly straightforward empirical stuff with lots of numbers. That’s not to say that this kind of analysis is easy. If it was someone else might have done it all years ago. John Tincey was the first person to try it, but he only did the smallest of the three account books, which is a fraction of the size of the other two. Following his lead I decided to do all of them.

In 1999 I spent about 2 weeks in the PRO typing these lists into an Access database. I’m still using that transcript as the basis of my work now, although I’ve converted it to XML to make it more flexible and checked a selection of the entries against digital photos of the manuscript. I’ve been using the Python classes that I developed for representing uncertainty to calculate totals of horses and values. Some pages are damaged, meaning that exact totals can’t be calculated – this is something that was difficult to deal with in Access but the combination of XML and Python has enough flexibility to cope with it. Getting totals for days and months is fairly easy, but I also want to group by the social status of the donors and the counties that they came from. Before I can group by counties I need to identify place names given in the manuscript as although some entries specify a county in the address, many more give a place name without a county.

(more…)

Last week I learnt about using exceptions, which turned out to be the solution to a problem that I’ve mentioned before: if you try to do anything with a variable that hasn’t been initialized, Python throws an exception. In many ways this is good, because trying to do things with non-existent variables can otherwise be a source of hard to find bugs. However, I found it quite annoying when I got exceptions just for checking for a variable and only trying to do things with it inside an if block if it exists. Even the seemingly innocuous statement “if x” will bring a program to a halt if x doesn’t exist.

The way around this is to handle the exception when it occurs, so that the program keeps running but you know that the variable doesn’t exist. For example:

try:
    x
except NameError:
    #x doesn't exist
else:
    #x does exist

This code tries to reference x. If x doesn’t exist, an exception occurs and the code after except is executed (but only if the type of exception thrown matches what’s specified between except and the colon). If x does exist the code after else is executed instead. This is a bit long winded compared to “if x” but it’s better than nothing. Also be aware that different kinds of variables throw different kinds of exceptions when they don’t exist.

• NameError – any single instance of a built in type or custom object, or a sequence where the sequence itself doesn’t exist, eg x
• IndexError – numerical index of a sequence where the sequence exists but the specified element doesn’t, eg x[5]
• KeyError – index of a map where the map exists but an element with that index doesn’t, eg x['y']
• AttributeError – attribute of an object where the object exists but the specified attribute doesn’t eg x.y (often occurs with objects representing XML elements as it can be difficult to predict what child elements they contain)

In December I wrote some Python code to do calculations with pre-decimal British currency. As well as dealing with the awkwardness of pounds, shillings, and pence, I needed to allow for situations where a damaged or illegible manuscript made the values uncertain. To start with I wrote a class called MetaOldMoney which could store exact amounts of money or ranges of values.

Now I’ve written some new code which can easily deal with uncertain values of anything. There are three classes: one to represent an exact value, one to represent a range where the minimum and maximum values are known, and one to represent a minimum value with no maximum. Instances of all three objects contain a tuple of two values. For an exact value they’re both the same, for a range they contain the upper and lower amount, and for a minimum the second value is set to None. The addition operator is redefined so that any combination of these objects can be added together, returning an object of the correct type eg Exact + Range = Range etc. The best thing is that the values contained can be of absolutely any type. Taking full advantage of the Python approach to typing, the classes I’ve defined don’t even need to know what they contain. The addition will just work as long as the contained objects can be added together.

These classes are so flexible that there are lots of different ways I could use them. I could put my OldMoney objects inside them, or I could define a new money object which contains individual uncertain values for pound, shillings and pence. I could even nest the objects inside each other to allow for situations where the maximum value in a range is also a range.

Code below: (more…)

Following on from adding an interactive index of people to my digital edition of Sandall’s history of 5th Lincs, I’ve now added a similar feature for place names. It works in exactly the same way as the person index, but it also has a map view. Again this uses the Exhibit API, which makes it very easy to mash up data with Google Maps without even having to know anything about the Google Maps API. The map view is a bit slower than the normal view, especially if the list isn’t filtered, but that’s an inherent limitation of using maps.

One of the many cool things about the map is that it strikingly illustrates the allied advances in the last months of the First World War. If you go into the map view and click “The Beginning of the Great Advance” on the list of chapters, you’ll see the battalion holding the line in Flanders, then moving behind the lines for rest near Amiens, then moving up to the front line at Saint-Quentin. Then click on each of the following chapters in turn and watch the markers surge forward as 46th Division breaks through the Hindenburg Line and pushes towards Belgium.

Adding the place index was mostly similar to adding the person index: I added a unique id to each<placeName> tag using a Python script, pulled out the place names into an SQLite database, identified/disambiguated them and added a regularized name, then used another Python script to pull the regularized names out of the database and put them into the key attributes in the XML file. Identifying the places was easier than identifying people, and took a couple of days, although there are a few that I couldn’t find. As with people I added some code the the XSLT to generate a JSON file of all the places. Then following the map view tutorial I used the Exhibit API to pull latitude and longitude co-ordinates from Google Maps and put them into another JSON file. This turned out to be a bit unreliable as about 10 per cent of the places had their co-ordinates missing. It seems to be random, as running the script again with the same set of data produced a similar error rate but with different places. I had to take the missing places from the output file, put them into another input file and run the script over them again, which produced a similar 10 per cent error rate, but the remaining few co-ordinates could be put in manually. Once I had a JSON file with all the correct geocodes it was easy to copy code from the tutorial to add a map view to the Exhibit page. In a few cases it turned out that Google had given me the wrong co-ordinates. Mostly this was because there are two or more places with the same name and it had picked the wrong one. I thought I’d put in enough information from my manual searches to disambiguate them but it seems that the results of a Google Map search can be a bit unpredictable, and don’t necessarily give you the full address of a place.

I’ve now done most of what I planned to do in this phase. There are still some features that could be added, especially a feedback mechanism, but I’ll be giving this project a rest soon so I can do some English Civil War work.

My digital edition of Sandall’s History of 1/5th Lincolnshire Regiment now has a new index of people. In my last post I described how names were marked up in the text. This post is about how I linked them together.

(more…)

On to the next stage of digitizing Sandall’s History of 5th Lincolnshire Regiment. Having marked up the structure of the text and written XSLT to split the book into several HTML pages with working internal links, I could move on to Phase 2: marking up name, dates, and abbreviations.

(more…)

My project to digitize T. E. Sandall’s history of the 1/5th Lincolnshire regiment in the First World War has made very good progress this week. I’ve now uploaded a new HTML version. This features links to page images and a working index: if you click on a page number in the index it takes you to the corresponding part of the text. The whole book is still on one page as I haven’t worked out how to split it yet but it’s an improvement over the previous interim version. Below are more details of what I’ve done and how I’ve done it.

(more…)