<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Princes (and Two Rebels)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2010/01/02/two-princes-and-two-rebels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2010/01/02/two-princes-and-two-rebels/</link>
	<description>Failing better at understanding the past</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:50:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2010/01/02/two-princes-and-two-rebels/comment-page-1/#comment-14426</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/?p=709#comment-14426</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that link - it&#039;s fascinating and has given me a lot to think about. It seems to be assumed that a rapist&#039;s horse will necessarily have a scrotum. This is vague speculation, but I&#039;m wondering if that suggests a belief in some kind of humoural sympathy between horse and rider, or even a causal relationship: the heat of the stallion caused the man&#039;s humours to overheat and made him commit rape.

Bracton seems to be quite different from early-modern English attitudes to rape. There seems to be less emphasis on rape as a property crime against men than there was later, but maybe more emphasis on the sacredness of virginity. It&#039;s also interesting that he explicitly says that if a woman was a whore before it&#039;s still rape if she doesn&#039;t consent. Another nail in the coffin of the Whig idea of progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that link &#8211; it&#8217;s fascinating and has given me a lot to think about. It seems to be assumed that a rapist&#8217;s horse will necessarily have a scrotum. This is vague speculation, but I&#8217;m wondering if that suggests a belief in some kind of humoural sympathy between horse and rider, or even a causal relationship: the heat of the stallion caused the man&#8217;s humours to overheat and made him commit rape.</p>
<p>Bracton seems to be quite different from early-modern English attitudes to rape. There seems to be less emphasis on rape as a property crime against men than there was later, but maybe more emphasis on the sacredness of virginity. It&#8217;s also interesting that he explicitly says that if a woman was a whore before it&#8217;s still rape if she doesn&#8217;t consent. Another nail in the coffin of the Whig idea of progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henchminion</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2010/01/02/two-princes-and-two-rebels/comment-page-1/#comment-14425</link>
		<dc:creator>Henchminion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/?p=709#comment-14425</guid>
		<description>Slightly OT, I just ran across a reference that may interest you.  The thirteenth-century English legal treatise known as Bracton has a passage about the sexual shaming of a rapist&#039;s horse.  You can find it on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://hlsl5.law.harvard.edu/bracton/index.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;electronic Bracton&lt;/a&gt; in vol. 2, p. 418.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly OT, I just ran across a reference that may interest you.  The thirteenth-century English legal treatise known as Bracton has a passage about the sexual shaming of a rapist&#8217;s horse.  You can find it on the <a href="http://hlsl5.law.harvard.edu/bracton/index.htm" rel="nofollow">electronic Bracton</a> in vol. 2, p. 418.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linkblogging for 02/01/10 (OK, so I was completely wrong about the whole palindrome thing&#8230;) &#171; Sci-Ence! Justice Leak!</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2010/01/02/two-princes-and-two-rebels/comment-page-1/#comment-14424</link>
		<dc:creator>Linkblogging for 02/01/10 (OK, so I was completely wrong about the whole palindrome thing&#8230;) &#171; Sci-Ence! Justice Leak!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 18:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/?p=709#comment-14424</guid>
		<description>[...] Gavin R may have found the source of a mistake in a Ladybird book he reviewed a while [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gavin R may have found the source of a mistake in a Ladybird book he reviewed a while [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

