<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Representing uncertainty in Python</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2008/02/28/representing-uncertainty-in-python/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2008/02/28/representing-uncertainty-in-python/</link>
	<description>Failing better at understanding the past</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2008/02/28/representing-uncertainty-in-python/#comment-13837</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2008/02/28/representing-uncertainty-in-python/#comment-13837</guid>
		<description>For now I've decided to make the value of a &lt;code&gt;MetaMin&lt;/code&gt; object a single value tuple and use &lt;code&gt;try&lt;/code&gt; to check for an exception. Maybe not the most elegant way to do it but it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For now I&#8217;ve decided to make the value of a <code>MetaMin</code> object a single value tuple and use <code>try</code> to check for an exception. Maybe not the most elegant way to do it but it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2008/02/28/representing-uncertainty-in-python/#comment-13834</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2008/02/28/representing-uncertainty-in-python/#comment-13834</guid>
		<description>Or maybe it's not that simple. That fix works when the object only contains built-in types but custom objects are a bit of a problem when it comes to comparing them with None...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe it&#8217;s not that simple. That fix works when the object only contains built-in types but custom objects are a bit of a problem when it comes to comparing them with None&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2008/02/28/representing-uncertainty-in-python/#comment-13832</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2008/02/28/representing-uncertainty-in-python/#comment-13832</guid>
		<description>But there's a bug in this code that I've just discovered. In the add functions "if other.value[1]" should be "if other.value[1] != None" otherwise exact values of 0 get converted to minimum values. Doh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But there&#8217;s a bug in this code that I&#8217;ve just discovered. In the add functions &#8220;if other.value[1]&#8221; should be &#8220;if other.value[1] != None&#8221; otherwise exact values of 0 get converted to minimum values. Doh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
