<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Military History Carnival?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/</link>
	<description>Failing better at understanding the past</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:50:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/comment-page-1/#comment-1436</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/#comment-1436</guid>
		<description>I think the first one will be in mid-April as starting it in March will clash with the 50th History Carnival. Also a longer build-up will allow more time to generate publicity.

I&#039;ll probably be changing web hosts this week, so there might be some downtime here. Once that&#039;s out of the way I&#039;ll make a final decision on the name, put together a web page for the carnival and register it with Blog Carnival etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the first one will be in mid-April as starting it in March will clash with the 50th History Carnival. Also a longer build-up will allow more time to generate publicity.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll probably be changing web hosts this week, so there might be some downtime here. Once that&#8217;s out of the way I&#8217;ll make a final decision on the name, put together a web page for the carnival and register it with Blog Carnival etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nonpartisan</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/comment-page-1/#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>Nonpartisan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 23:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in for this.  An excellent idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in for this.  An excellent idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Grimsley</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/comment-page-1/#comment-1284</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Grimsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/#comment-1284</guid>
		<description>I like the idea and concur with Grant Jones on the name:  &quot;Carnival of Military History&quot; (or &quot;Military History Carnival&quot;) is straightforward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea and concur with Grant Jones on the name:  &#8220;Carnival of Military History&#8221; (or &#8220;Military History Carnival&#8221;) is straightforward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/comment-page-1/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/#comment-1219</guid>
		<description>In the light of that it should definitely be middle of the month to avoid History Carnival. I still think I&#039;ll try monthly and see how it goes, but reducing to two months might turn out to be necessary. It&#039;s hard to judge the likely interest until you actually try it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the light of that it should definitely be middle of the month to avoid History Carnival. I still think I&#8217;ll try monthly and see how it goes, but reducing to two months might turn out to be necessary. It&#8217;s hard to judge the likely interest until you actually try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/comment-page-1/#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/#comment-1218</guid>
		<description>Oh, and FYI the Executor would TOTALLY pwn the Enterprise. I mean, just look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.people.iup.edu/pnwm/comparison.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;size of that thing&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and FYI the Executor would TOTALLY pwn the Enterprise. I mean, just look at <a href="http://www.people.iup.edu/pnwm/comparison.gif" rel="nofollow">size of that thing</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/comment-page-1/#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>Does Sharon&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earlymodernweb.org.uk/emn/index.php/archives/2007/02/history-carnival-48/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;announcement&lt;/a&gt;  that the History Carnival will soon go monthly enter into the calculations? Eg perhaps the MHC should be monthly also and appear in the middle of the month, so as to complement the HC. And/or, given what Sharon says about &quot;carnival fatigue&quot;, maybe it should be every two months ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Sharon&#8217;s <a href="http://www.earlymodernweb.org.uk/emn/index.php/archives/2007/02/history-carnival-48/" rel="nofollow">announcement</a>  that the History Carnival will soon go monthly enter into the calculations? Eg perhaps the MHC should be monthly also and appear in the middle of the month, so as to complement the HC. And/or, given what Sharon says about &#8220;carnival fatigue&#8221;, maybe it should be every two months &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>Another thing to think about: whether it&#039;s once a month or every two months, where in a month should it be - beginning, middle, or end?

Number of posts to include in each one: History Carnival recommends 20-40, which is probably about right. Maybe no more than a quarter on the same war.

It&#039;s good that there are so many people blogging about the ACW. It would be nice to encourage similar numbers to blog on other wars rather than trying to keep down the number of ACW blogs.

Language is going to have to be mostly English, but individual hosts could include a few posts in different languages at their discretion.

I&#039;ve also been thinking about representations of war in fiction. What about representations of fictional wars? In fictional universes? Where do you draw the line? It wouldn&#039;t be good to have science fiction fans arguing about whether the Enterprise could beat the Executor, but it also wouldn&#039;t be good to exclude stuff like Esther&#039;s work on WoW. Maybe leave it up to hosts to use their &quot;common sense&quot;. I think quality is more important than rigid guidelines about subject matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing to think about: whether it&#8217;s once a month or every two months, where in a month should it be &#8211; beginning, middle, or end?</p>
<p>Number of posts to include in each one: History Carnival recommends 20-40, which is probably about right. Maybe no more than a quarter on the same war.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good that there are so many people blogging about the ACW. It would be nice to encourage similar numbers to blog on other wars rather than trying to keep down the number of ACW blogs.</p>
<p>Language is going to have to be mostly English, but individual hosts could include a few posts in different languages at their discretion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also been thinking about representations of war in fiction. What about representations of fictional wars? In fictional universes? Where do you draw the line? It wouldn&#8217;t be good to have science fiction fans arguing about whether the Enterprise could beat the Executor, but it also wouldn&#8217;t be good to exclude stuff like Esther&#8217;s work on WoW. Maybe leave it up to hosts to use their &#8220;common sense&#8221;. I think quality is more important than rigid guidelines about subject matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/comment-page-1/#comment-1151</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/#comment-1151</guid>
		<description>This is a great idea.  I think you should just go with &quot;Carnival of Military History.&quot; I&#039;m always in favor of KiSS.  I don&#039;t think military historians should use euphemisms to define or describe what they do, it sounds defensive.  If some people are &quot;put off&quot; by military history, that&#039;s their loss.

I would be willing to host sometime in the future.  

Best of luck,
Grant Jones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great idea.  I think you should just go with &#8220;Carnival of Military History.&#8221; I&#8217;m always in favor of KiSS.  I don&#8217;t think military historians should use euphemisms to define or describe what they do, it sounds defensive.  If some people are &#8220;put off&#8221; by military history, that&#8217;s their loss.</p>
<p>I would be willing to host sometime in the future.  </p>
<p>Best of luck,<br />
Grant Jones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/comment-page-1/#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>At the risk of fouling the pond as one of the &quot;ACW Problem&quot;, I&#039;d be happy to host or otherwise pitch in.  I vote for monthly.  Hard to get up a head of steam if too far apart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of fouling the pond as one of the &#8220;ACW Problem&#8221;, I&#8217;d be happy to host or otherwise pitch in.  I vote for monthly.  Hard to get up a head of steam if too far apart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabakov</title>
		<link>http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/comment-page-1/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabakov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investigations.4-lom.com/2007/02/10/military-history-carnival/#comment-1140</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great idea! Military history has been central to history in general and to how much of how we got where we are now, technologically, culturally, socially and economically.</p>
<p>And I agree with everyone above who has pointed out you need to get the name right so that it does reflect the full spectrum of what you want to cover without turning off those that may otherwise get into what the concept can offer and without attracting roving bandits and sleazy militias. And without being sounding too bland or glorifying the worst and dismissing the best either. And remember, the one thing all soldiers have in common, everywhere and anywhere is a very black sense of humour.</p>
<p>In this spirit, I proffer a few title suggestions, some of them serious:<br />
Up In Arms<br />
Supply Lines<br />
The Last Post<br />
Blood, Sweat and Tears<br />
A Darkling Plain<br />
Mentioned In Dispatches<br />
Fight Club<br />
Military Musings<br />
Present Arms<br />
War and Pieces<br />
Blogs Of War<br />
Out of Uniform<br />
Reconnaissance<br />
Out On The Flanks<br />
History Is Hell<br />
The Military History Parade<br />
Behind The Front<br />
Outposts<br />
The Lost Patrol<br />
The Bloggers Legion<br />
Reasoning Why<br />
The Free Company<br />
I don&#8217;t know what they do to the lurkers but by God they scare me.<br />
It’s The Wrong Way To Tickle Mary<br />
(OK, now the scotch is kicking in and I&#8217;m getting messy)</p>
<p>I reckon bimonthly is probably a better way to go as this is a subject where research and properly appreciating the situation should guide polemics and half-arsed opinions rather than vice versa. Also I think something like the ten-year rule is a good one too. Maybe 25 years? It usually takes a generation or so to dampen the real heat and smoke of personal experience, whether on the frontline or the home front. </p>
<p>But let&#8217;s face it, you&#8217;re gonna get some online punchups whether you like it or not. We&#8217;re talking about mainly male and rather focused people discussing fighting. But judging from the comments here, most would have too much respect for the subject to get really personal and nasty. &#8216;Cept when it comes to that bounder Haig though.</p>
<p>And yes I&#8217;d to like to contribute m&#8217;self but not having a blog of my own, I&#8217;ll just sign up for the duration as an irregular in someone else&#8217;s outfit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

